English grammar - linking words
With the exception of the automatic summary when creating a redirect, which usually says all that needs to be said, these are not a substitute for a proper edit summary you should always leave a meaningful summary, even in the above cases. They are, however, useful in providing some context for edits made by inexperienced users who are not aware of the importance of edit summaries, and for spotting vandalism. When starting a new thread on a talk page by using the "New section" tab, the text you type into the "subject/headline" field becomes both the heading of your discussion topic, and the edit summary for that edit. Tags see also: wikipedia:Tags Tags (i.e., edit tags) are brief messages that the software automatically places next to certain edits in histories, recent changes and other special pages. They are implemented by the edit filter to help assist vandalism patrollers and other page watchers. They cannot be added marathi or removed manually. Notes for experienced users There are standard templates for warning editors who delete content without providing an edit summary: Uw-delete1 (which assumes good faith) and Uw-delete2 (which doesn't). Uw-editsummary is available for notifying users who have not provided an edit summary for other types of edit. These are available via twinkle. When editors stand for Adminship, their RfA pages include statistics about how often they have provided edit summaries in the past. A user's edit summary usage can be checked with this tool.( example ) If you are a registered user and want to show your commitment to always leaving edit summaries, which will remind other users of the importance of doing so, you can use any.
Details of the edit should be added after this text. When viewing management such an edit summary, the section name will appear in grey, with a small arrow next to it: External links. Click the arrow to view the section (if the section no longer exists, the link will simply take you to the top of the page). If you create a new section before or after an existing section by clicking a section " edit " link, delete the text between and marks (or change it to the new section title) to avoid confusion. 1 It used to be possible to manually include links to multiple sections using the syntax this may be useful when editing several sections at once. The edit summary: foo test bar test should be rendered as: foo test bar test. Automatic summaries main page: Help:Automatic edit summaries In certain circumstances, an automatic summary is generated when an edit is published without one. This is slightly different from the summary added when editing a section, as that can be modified by the user before saving.
Edit summaries render internal links, including piped links, and interwiki links, even when enclosed within nowiki and /nowiki. Therefore, copying wikitext in the edit summary box may be preferable to copying text from the preview, except assignments when one wants to save space. Other wikitext coding is not interpreted. Urls do not produce clickable links but a wikilink with Special:Diff/ can make clickable diffs, and Special:PermaLink/ can make permanent links. has no effect, so do not sign edit summaries. You can mention a user in your edit summary and they will receive a notification. Places where the edit summary appears The edit summary appears in black italics in the following places: Notes Use the enhanced watchlist to see all recent changes in the watched pages, not just the last change in each page. Section editing When adding a new section to a discussion page with the "new section" button, the section title is used as the edit summary. When editing an existing section, the section title is inserted at the beginning of the edit summary, enclosed with and marks, for example external links.
The edit summary box can hold one line of approximately 500 characters. If you attempt to type or paste more, only the first 500 will be displayed the rest will be discarded. For example, attempting to add 10 new characters (at the end or in between) to a summary already containing 495 characters may result in the first 5 new characters being inserted and the second 5 being disregarded. The "Show preview" button also provides a preview of the edit summary to facilitate checking links. Can't be changed after saving. After you publish the page, you cannot change the edit summary (see bugs 1017 ). Doesn't appear in searches. The built-in search function cannot search edit summaries, and they are not indexed by external search engines. Wikilinks always rendered; other wikitext coding ignored.
For and Against Essays - academic Writing
If the edit involves reverting previous changes, it should be marked as a revert rv in the edit summary. Avoid using edit summaries to carry on debates or negotiation over the content or to express opinions of the other users involved. This creates an atmosphere where the only way to carry on discussion is to revert other editors! If you notice this happening, start a section on the talk page and place your comments there. This keeps discussions and debates away from the article page itself.
For example: reverted edits by User:Example, see talk for rationale fixing After you publish the page, you cannot change the edit summary, so be careful with it, particularly if you are in a heated content dispute do not write things you will regret. If you make an important omission or error in an edit summary, you can correct this by making a dummy edit (a change in the page with no visible effects and adding further information in its own edit summary. In the extreme case of an edit summary containing certain kinds of harmful content, the summary can be deleted on request. They may be removed from public view by administrators using revision Deletion ; such edit summaries remain visible to administrators. In even more limited circumstances the entire edit may be oversighted, leaving it and its edit summary visible only to the handful of users with the oversight permission. Edit summary properties for and features Limited to 500 characters.
Mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important. You could add something like "and misc." to cover the other changes. While edit summaries can be terse, they should still be specific. Providing an edit summary similar to "I made some changes" is functionally equivalent to not providing a summary at all. Edit summaries are not for writing essays about 'the truth' or longwinding arguments with fellow editors. For discussions, you should use the talk page.
You should explain your edits, but without being overly critical or harsh when editing or reverting others' work. This may be perceived as uncivil, and cause resentment or conflict. Explain what you changed, citing the relevant policies, guidelines or principles of good writing, but do not target others in a way that may come across as a personal attack. Snide comments, personal remarks about editors, and other aggressive edit summaries are explicit edit-summary "don't's" of the wikipedia civility policy. Use of edit summaries in disputes Proper use of edit summaries is critical to resolving content disputes. Edit summaries should accurately and succinctly summarize the nature of the edit, especially if it could be controversial.
Anywhere: 13 Free web
They can be confusing for new contributors. For an explanation of some commonly used abbreviations, xmas see this edit summary legend. Expand on important information. Readers who see only the summary might not get the entire picture. Prevent misunderstanding: If an edit requires more explanation than will fit in the summary box, post a comment to the article's talk page to give more information, and include "see talk" or "see discussion page" in the edit summary. If you are copying text within wikipedia, resume you must at least put a link to the source page in the edit summary at the destination page. When editing talk pages, consider reflecting the gist of your comment in the edit summary; this allows users to check recent changes, page history and User contributions (see below) very efficiently. What to avoid in edit summaries avoid misleading summaries.
it in detail. Summaries are less important for minor changes (which means generally unchallengeable changes such as spelling or grammar corrections but a brief note like "fixed spelling" is helpful even then. To avoid accidentally leaving edit summaries blank, you can select "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" on the. Editing tab of your user preferences, if you have created an account. How to write an edit summary summarize. Summarize the change, even if only briefly; even a short summary is better than no summary. Give reasons for the change, if you think other editors may be unclear as to why you made. Citing the wikipedia policies or guidelines that you feel justified the change may be incorporated into your explanation. Abbreviations should be used with care.
You agree that din a hyperlink or url is sufficient attribution under the Creative commons license. Publish changes, show preview, show changes. Cancel, the edit summary field appears above the "Publish changes" button. It is good practice to fill in the edit summary field, or add to it in the case of section editing, as this helps others to understand the intention of your edit. Edit summaries are displayed in lists of changes (such as page histories and watchlists and at the top of diff pages. Contents, always provide an edit summary, it is considered good practice to provide a summary for every edit, especially when reverting (undoing) the actions of other editors or deleting existing text; otherwise, people may question your motives for the edit. Edits that do not have an edit summary are more likely to be reverted, because it may not be obvious what the purpose of the edit was. Accurate summaries help other contributors decide whether it is worthwhile for them to review an edit, and to understand the change should they choose to review. When a major edit (e.g.
Cookie statement - wikimedia foundation